Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
European Heart Journal ; 42(SUPPL 1):188, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1554672

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronary, thoracic aorta and aortic valve calcium can be measured from a non-gated chest computer tomography (CT) and are validated predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, their prognostic role in acute systemic inflammatory diseases, such as COVID-19, has not been investigated. Purpose: The principal aim was to evaluate the association of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and total thoracic calcium on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Then, to evaluate the prognostic impact of clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD), as assessed by CAC. Methods: 1093 consecutive patients from 16 Italian hospitals with a positive swab for COVID-19 and an admission chest CT for pneumonia severity assessment were included in the SCORE COVID-19 registry (calcium score for COVID-19 Risk Evaluation). At CT, coronary, aortic valve and thoracic aorta calcium were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated separately and combined together (total thoracic calcium) by a central Corelab blinded to patients' outcomes. A specific sub analysis on CAC was performed stratifying the patients in three groups: (a) “clinical CAD” (prior revascularization history), (b) “subclinical CAD” (CAC >0), (c) “No CAD” (CAC=0). In-hospital mortality was the primary endpoint, while a composite of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident (MI/CVA) was the secondary one. Results: Non-survivors compared to survivors had higher coronary artery [(487.7±565.3 vs 207.7±406.8, p<0.001)], aortic valve [(322.4±390.9 vs 98.2±250.7 mm2, p<0.001)] and thoracic aorta [(3786.7±4225.5 vs 1487.6±2973.1 mm2, p<0.001)] calcium values. Coronary artery calcium (HR 1.308;95% CI, 1.046 - 1.637, p=0.019) and total thoracic calcium (HR 1.975;95% CI, 1.200 - 3.251, p=0.007) resulted to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In the sub - analysis increasing rates of in-hospital mortality (11.3% vs. 27.3% vs. 39.8%, p<0.001) and MI/CVA events (2.3% vs. 3.8% vs. 11.9%, p<0.001) were observed from the No CAD to the clinical CAD groups. Among patients with subclinical CAD, increasing CAC burden was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (20.5% vs. 27.9% vs. 38.7% for patients with CAC score thresholds ≤100, 101-400 and >400, respectively, p<0.001) Conclusion: Coronary, aortic valve and thoracic aortic calcium assessment on admission non-gated CT permits to stratify the COVID-19 patients in-hospital mortality risk. Cardiovascular calcifications may represent a bystander of an impaired vascular reserve, both microvascular and endothelial, but also a sign of vascular senescence. Therefore, it can be considered an index of biological frailty, likely more accurate than age and other risk factors. (Figure Presented).

2.
International Journal of Cardiology ; 29:29, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1209296

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The impact of Covid-19 on the survival of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains to be defined. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with ACS at 18 Centers in Northern-Italy during the Covid-19 outbreak were included. In-hospital all-cause death was the primary outcome. In-hospital cardiovascular death along with mechanical and electrical complications were the secondary ones. A case period (February 20, 2020-May 3, 2020) was compared vs. same-year (January 1-February 19, 2020) and previous-year control periods (February 20-May 3, 2019). ACS patients with Covid-19 were further compared with those without. RESULTS: Among 779 ACS patients admitted during the case period, 67 (8.6%) tested positive for Covid-19. In-hospital all-cause mortality was significantly higher during the case period compared to the control periods (6.4% vs. 3.5% vs. 4.4% respectively;p 0.026), but similar after excluding patients with COVID-19 (4.5% vs. 3.5% vs. 4.4%;p 0.73). Cardiovascular mortality was similar between the study groups. After multivariable adjustment, admission for ACS during the COVID-19 outbreak had no impact on in-hospital mortality. In the case period, patients with concomitant ACS and Covid-19 experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality (25% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without. Moreover, higher rates of cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock and sustained ventricular tachycardia were found in Covid-19 patients. CONCLUSION: ACS patients presenting during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced increased all-cause mortality, driven by Covid-19 positive status due to higher rates of cardiogenic shock and sustained ventricular tachycardia. No differences in cardiovascular mortality compared to non-pandemic scenarios were reported.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL